“That’s just… completely incorrect!” – Decoding the Devious Crossword Clue
Ah, the crossword. A seemingly simple, yet deceptively complex puzzle that can leave even the most seasoned solver scratching their head in frustration. And then there are those clues, those little linguistic landmines, that make you mutter under your breath, “That’s just… completely incorrect!”
This week’s perplexing puzzle presents a prime example: a clue that seems to defy all logic, leaving you questioning the sanity of the constructor. It’s a clue that’s not just tricky, it’s downright absurd.
But fear not, fellow crossword enthusiasts! While this particular clue may seem impossible to crack, we’re here to unravel its hidden depths, to expose its deceptive nature, and guide you to the solution.
So, grab your trusty pencil, a fresh cup of coffee, and prepare to embark on a journey of linguistic deduction. We’ll dissect the clue, analyze its structure, and explore the potential traps lurking within its wording.
By the end of this post, you’ll be armed with the tools to confidently tackle even the most challenging crossword clues, and you’ll be able to say with certainty: “Aha! I’ve got it!”
Let’s dive in and conquer this enigmatic clue together!
Available Answers:
UM … NO.
Last seen on the crossword puzzle: NY Times Crossword 17 Sep 24, Tuesday